/Lang (EN-US) 16.23(c) to the U.S. Department of Justice for the testimony of Mark Rosman and Karen Sharp. /Pg 17 0 R << /P 509 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj /P 505 0 R endobj 126 0 obj /K 13 335 0 obj /P 505 0 R /Tabs /S endobj FQ7#cM,u?ZFQwxduOnb'X)6&>7nM,m?GO68Gvxdmo8mbhX0&Eob;X1&Aob&
s;F16cM,~c;716i96xcG96x#@&MM]Mgi gysl?/y?/y?/y?/y?/y?/mb],mr&^L3M*>qM&>mDYoIM >y'NHf08l&;f07axNo8_37d
c{F=sX1`n #>k0807t!\}sWU0|psV77f
Y}ps#VG77^
W}tsU`U_a>{n>Q|n>0|JsS47:)
N}JscS4729L}Ns#STq>vndl>qvnXl>1OwnHpssqqq q";oDqxgyxx&m&H5s)0/-0Zx[6":)L6/f0K-d8ToXL1Nx6T5q,&EB1Qx6%)2FcIjIS-)2%ERY[gZVdUjY1X-q,Y1Y-+26eEhXYq10\(2EtVzVU8&E{"cZUdXkw.gvUEqd*2UE&E['s"cZSdZkEkM1i)265E?6)2f5E66(2m. /Parent 9 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 19 0 R /S /P /P 12 0 R 161), filed on October 7, 2020" . /P 509 0 R /Resources 490 0 R Note: Summary Judgment Motions have a 30 day Response period. /K 4 << /S /P /Lang (EN-US) << /P 56 0 R 312 0 obj << /Lang (EN-US) endobj << /Pg 45 0 R endobj 261 0 obj >> Courts differ on how they address motions to disqualify, especially because such motions are at times simply a litigation tactic by an opposing party in search of a strategic advantage.3 Additionally, courts are usually reluctant to interfere with a clients choice of counsel unless the conflict is real and there are few options other than to grant disqualification.4. 198 0 obj /P 531 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Type /Page /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 16 0 R << When it's warranted, a motion to disqualify the opposing counsel can be a potent weapon. /Kids [20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R 23 0 R 24 0 R] See Alps Prop., 526 F. Supp. /Pg 16 0 R endobj 33 [184 0 R 185 0 R 186 0 R 187 0 R 188 0 R 332 0 R 333 0 R 334 0 R 335 0 R 336 0 R 307 0 obj /P 12 0 R >> /K 22 9. 55 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /S /P << /K 3 It is only appropriate to disqualify an attorney due to her status as a potential witness if the attorney's testimony is 29 0 obj 285 0 obj /K 13 /P 12 0 R >> /Pg 20 0 R << /K 2 endobj 6:12-cv-01293-NAM-TWD (N.D.N.Y. /K 3 /Resources 440 0 R /Pg 15 0 R Frosh, Attorney General of Maryland, and Carrie J. Williams, Assistant Attorney General, pursuant to this Court's October 12, 2022 order, hereby responds to Mr. Syed's motion to disqualify the Office of the Attorney General as counsel for the State of Maryland or strike the State as a party to the appeal and states as follows: I. /S /P People v. Harlan, 54 P.3d 871, 877 (Colo. 2002). /P 12 0 R /K 7 /K [13 311 0 R 15] at 391; United States v. Wallach, 788 F. Supp. 238 0 obj >> 148 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R 260 0 obj endobj Generally, an order either disqualifying or refusing to disqualify a law firm is not appealable. endobj endobj 0000003370 00000 n
/Pg 26 0 R hbbd```b``@$Xd &`L CDrA@q/^b{ kjUA$&HK9tI
$ N
/Pg 19 0 R /P 12 0 R << endobj [ii] However, an order is final and appealable when it disqualifies a law firm which has represented a defendant during the trial from continuing its representation during an appeal, due to a conflict created when an attorney who represented the . /Pg 17 0 R /Pg 46 0 R << /S /P /Tabs /S /Lang (EN-US) << 263 0 obj You can find 3 available options; typing, drawing, or capturing one. /A 515 0 R /S /Reference 217 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R << /Pg 20 0 R /S /P << /Tabs /S 1 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R /K 8 /Pg 24 0 R endobj /P 12 0 R /K 27 J. 157 0 obj /Pg 42 0 R /K 13 >> 31 [177 0 R 178 0 R 179 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) 131 0 obj /Pg 19 0 R 256 0 obj /P 506 0 R /S /H1 /K 3 /Pg 44 0 R When a party wants to ask an Administrative Law Judge, or "ALJ," to do or change something about their case, it is called a "motion." Examples are requesting that a date for mediation be scheduled or that two cases be combined into one hearing (called a "consolidation"). /K 16 /K 5 /K 4 /S /P /Pg 37 0 R 339 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R /P 505 0 R >> 220 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) >> 300 0 obj >> After this hearing, M retained counsel (C.H.). /Lang (EN-US) Courts also appear to distinguish between conflicts based on multiple representations and those based on successive representations.5 After all, parties filing disqualification motions based on multiple representation conflicts are typically strangers to the attorneyclient relationship. << >> >> << 141 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Resources 407 0 R /K 0 << In determining whether to disqualify an attorney on the ground that he or she will likely be a witness, the court is guided, but not bound by, the standards set forth in Rule 3.7, and whether to disqualify an attorney rests in the sound discretion of the Court. (Att. << RESPONSE to Motion re 31 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Xcentric Ventures, LLC(an Arizona Corporation), Ed Magedson(an individual). >> /K 2 /S /P /Pg 45 0 R Increasingly, courts nationwide have recognized and accepted timely, effective ethics screens as a positive factor for permitting an attorney to continue the representation, although sometimes a screen is not enough to avoid the ramifications of an imputed conflict. /S /P /S /P endobj /Pg 19 0 R endobj 2022 California Rules of Court. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /S /P /StructParents 27 /P 296 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /S /P >> >> /S /P /S /Reference In assessing motions to disqualify based on conflicts, Colorado courts also consider (1) a clients preference for a particular counsel, (2) the clients right to confidentiality in communications with his or her attorney, (3) the integrity of the judicial process, and (4) the nature of the particular conflict of interest involved. 2. >> Cal. 206 0 obj 333 0 obj /S /P /StructParents 8 << /Pg 19 0 R /K 1 /K [6 323 0 R 8] /K [0 325 0 R 13] /S /P 319 0 obj << << >> ECF No. /S /H3 /K 2 >> Ct., 704 P.2d 851, 853 (Colo. 1985)). /Rotate 0 << /Count 5 << /Kids [15 0 R 16 0 R 17 0 R 18 0 R 19 0 R] 67 0 obj /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) endobj /S /P 113 0 obj 163 0 obj endobj United States v. Prantil, 764 F.2d 548, 551 (9th Cir. /S /H2 << endobj >> << /P 12 0 R /Pg 15 0 R << /Pg 25 0 R /K 33 229 0 obj See People v. Perez, 201 P.3d 1220, 1246 n.11 (Colo. 2009). /Pg 19 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /S /P 35 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) >> endobj /Parent 11 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /Lang (EN-US) endobj << endobj /Contents [463 0 R 464 0 R 465 0 R] /Pg 38 0 R /Outline /Span /Pg 29 0 R /Lang (EN-US) This is because it must be presumed that a client shared confidences with its attorney pursuant to the attorneyclient relationship.9 Appreciating this distinction is important to successfully making or defeating a motion to disqualify. /K 18 /Annots [] >> endobj << << 259 0 obj Because there are other witnesses available to testify, there is no compelling need to put the prosecuting attorneys on the stand to testify. >> /S /P endobj 739, 744 (S.D.N.Y. /Lang (EN-US) /Resources 474 0 R endobj He then filed a Motion for Discovery on January 29, 2002, and a Motion for Evidentiary Hearing on February 1, 2002. >> 0000000016 00000 n
Mar. 244 0 obj endobj endobj /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /K 40 /P 531 0 R /P 304 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /S /H3 /P 55 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /S /P endobj /S /P This is often referred to as playbook knowledgethe attorney knows the clients paths and approaches. /S /H3 /Pg 15 0 R /K 5 endobj << << << endobj /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 22 0 R << << /S /H2 /S /P /K 59 /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 45 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /K 3 /S /P << /Lang (EN-US) << /P 508 0 R /K 10 >> This comment makes clear that attorneys are permitted, under some circumstances, to engage in representations that are adverse to a former client. endobj << >> /P 55 0 R /Pg 16 0 R endobj /Pg 18 0 R >> /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R /Pg 28 0 R Motion to Disqualify - 4 should include disqualifying an attorney for a party for conflicts of interest under the RPCs. >> United States v. Wallach, 788 F. Supp. << /S /P 2023 Dentons. >> endobj << << /S /P /Type /Pages /P 506 0 R /K 6 /P 531 0 R 165 0 obj /ModDate (D:20190627090514-04'00') /S /P << /P 12 0 R 250 0 obj << /S /Reference << /K 0 << /P 12 0 R >> 1992)). /Pg 41 0 R /Lang (EN-US) The Commission did not receive other responses to the motion, or a reply to Cal Advocates' response. 314 0 obj 325 0 obj to the subject matter of this litigation. She must asker lawyer. /Lang (EN-US) Upon consideration of the defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. /Resources 422 0 R /Pg 16 0 R << 161 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Annots [] /Annots [] /Pg 15 0 R 94 0 obj << /P 507 0 R endobj endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj /S /P 222 0 obj 209 0 R 210 0 R 211 0 R 212 0 R 213 0 R 214 0 R 215 0 R 216 0 R 217 0 R 218 0 R 336 0 obj /S /P /Pg 18 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Contents [376 0 R 377 0 R 378 0 R] 341 0 obj /P 12 0 R << >> /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /K 1 /P 132 0 R /Pg 26 0 R << 24 [156 0 R 157 0 R] >> >> endstream
endobj
234 0 obj
<. /Lang (EN-US) /Type /Pages /Pg 35 0 R /Pg 16 0 R >> endstream 145 0 obj 0
>> endobj >> /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 15 0 R >> /P 12 0 R /Pg 16 0 R 241 0 obj /Pg 20 0 R endobj << endobj /Pg 46 0 R endobj endobj /S /Reference /Lang (EN-US) /K [14 281 0 R 16] << >> /Type /Page 17 [132 0 R 134 0 R 135 0 R 136 0 R 137 0 R null 322 0 R 323 0 R 322 0 R null /Lang (EN-US) (quoting People ex rel. In Brothers, the defendants tried to disqualify the prosecuting attorneys for being potential trial witnesses because the prosecutors had participated in a meeting in which the defendant was offered immunity. /P 508 0 R /Pg 30 0 R SHARP The United States, through the undersigned attorney, hereby responds to the defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. endobj 95 0 obj /Parent 10 0 R 263 0 R 264 0 R 265 0 R 266 0 R 267 0 R 268 0 R 269 0 R 270 0 R 271 0 R 272 0 R 192 0 obj endobj >> /K 1 130 0 obj endobj Introduction endobj 0000006178 00000 n
<< 309 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) 101 0 obj /K 2 >> 193 0 obj << 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R 202 0 R] endobj /Pg 26 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Lang (EN-US) endobj 20 [142 0 R 143 0 R] As the Colorado Supreme Court has noted, [v]iolation of an ethical rule, in itself, is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for disqualification, although there typically must be evidence of a violation or potential violation of attorney ethical proscriptions, such as those centered on the duties of loyalty and fairness or those intended to protect the integrity of the process.8 Often, motions to disqualify turn on the risk that a clients former attorney or law firm might be able to use against the client the confidences or secrets gained during the prior representation. /S /P >> A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. /K 3 /K 3 /P 505 0 R << /K 0 endobj /S /P /Resources 428 0 R /P 509 0 R endobj 82 0 obj << /Lang (EN-US) In recent months, a number of high-profile disqualification motions have been reported.1 Many disqualification motions are well-founded. 114 0 obj endobj >> /Lang (EN-US) 15 316 0 R 16 [127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R] >> >> /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /Pg 17 0 R 856 F. Supp. /K 7 /Pg 17 0 R /S /TOC Official websites use .gov /K [1 326 0 R 15] << In addition, if the motion is made by a former client, attorneys should consider providing notice of a potential circumstance to their legal malpractice insurer. /S /Reference Few things are worse for an attorney than getting a new big matter, starting work on it, and then facing a motion to disqualify. /K 1 Sharp, and the response of the United States. << /K 1 /Pg 22 0 R /Lang (EN-US) endobj 308 0 obj /P 529 0 R >> >> /K 18 /K 11 Defendant's Motion at 1. /P 164 0 R << >> 338 0 obj 228 0 obj /K 2 /S /P >> /P 12 0 R 62 0 obj at 390-91. /Pg 45 0 R By far the majority of successful motions to disqualify are brought on the basis of a conflict of interest with a former or concurrent client or imputation, but attorneys should also be aware that successful motions to disqualify have been brought on the following bases, among others: (1) lawyer as witness, (2) appearance of impropriety, (3) receipt of confidential data, (4) personal interest, (5) violation of the no contact rules, and (6) misconduct with a witness. 132 0 obj /StructParents 31 318 0 R null 319 0 R 123 0 R 320 0 R 123 0 R 321 0 R 123 0 R] /Pg 17 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /Tabs /S Notice of Motion and Motion. 188 0 obj /StructParents 32 << /S /P >> /Lang (EN-US) 214 0 obj 349 0 obj You are responsible for serving the other party with a copy of your filed forms, usually by mail or e-service. << /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 27 0 R >> /Type /Page 215 0 obj /Type /Pages /Lang (EN-US) >> 50 0 obj My name is Adam C. Sloane. << /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) endobj /K [10 279 0 R 12] endobj /P 508 0 R /Pg 15 0 R << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] << endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj 85 0 obj 142 0 obj 1985) (finding defendant had a compelling need for prosecutor's testimony when that testimony was the only source of vital evidence). The two motions to disqualify have been opposed; the motion to strike is unopposed. /Lang (EN-US) 160 0 obj >> /S /P /K 1 >> >> 92 0 obj 209 0 obj /S /P /K [503 0 R 504 0 R] Notice of Motion and Motion: The . Under the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct (Colorado Rules or Colo. RCP), an attorney must safeguard client confidences and secrets, subject to a few exceptions.2 The attorney is also obligated to elevate the clients interests above the interests of the attorney and the law firm. /K 11 When faced with a motion to disqualify, the first course of action is typically to notify the client. << ; Utica Mut. /Parent 11 0 R /S /P and Cynthia J. Presley (Presley). /Pg 26 0 R endobj /Pg 24 0 R Defendant's Motion at 1-3. /S /P The motion can be brought by either a prosecutor . /S /P /Pg 22 0 R /Pg 16 0 R >> >> The defendant has failed to demonstrate a compelling need to call the prosecutors as witnesses in this case. /P 302 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /Pg 17 0 R endobj endobj /Parent 9 0 R /K 1 << << /K 2 /Pg 22 0 R << /P 12 0 R endobj 17, 2020), the Central District of California decided a motion to disqualify brought by the defendant based on two grounds: (1) a purported conflict based on plaintiff's counsel's prior employment by the defendant; and (2) plaintiff's counsel's improper receipt of information, procured 0000005497 00000 n
His argument is self-defeating. /S /P /Rotate 0 << /Pg 15 0 R >> endobj << /K [274 0 R 276 0 R 278 0 R 280 0 R 282 0 R 284 0 R 286 0 R 288 0 R 290 0 R 292 0 R << northwoods educational foundation, inc.'s reply to plaintiff's response to motion to disqualify and response to motion for sanctions /S /P << 117 0 R 118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R 123 0 R 124 0 R 125 0 R 126 0 R /Rotate 0 << /Lang (EN-US) /P 288 0 R /Pg 46 0 R << >> endobj endobj /P 56 0 R 344 0 obj /P 508 0 R /Pg 44 0 R /P 12 0 R /P 507 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 123 0 R << citation to the law supporting the request. 262 0 obj Once a motion to disqualify the judge in question has been filed, the judge will be served a copy of the affidavit. *243 In addition, the motion was not timely. /PageLayout /OneColumn /S /P /Pg 37 0 R /Pg 28 0 R /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R /K 8 A motion to disqualify should be made with "reasonable promptness" after the party becomes aware of the conflict so that it cannot be used as a strategic tool to deprive his opponent of counsel after a substantial amount of time has been spent on a case. /P 508 0 R /Pg 45 0 R /K 4 >> must. /K 27 /Lang (EN-US) /K 16 /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /P 531 0 R /Pg 46 0 R << /Pg 43 0 R /Parent 3 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /S /P endobj 40 326 0 R 41 329 0 R 42 330 0 R] >> endobj endobj /K 20 endobj >> Motions to disqualify counsel are orchestrated for two primary reasons: Either an attorney or law firm have been unduly abusive or they have been so effective in defending or prosecuting a case. /Parent 3 0 R /Resources 391 0 R /K 13 >> /P 276 0 R << 298 0 R 299 0 R 298 0 R null 300 0 R 301 0 R 300 0 R null 302 0 R 303 0 R >> endobj << 61 0 obj endobj 177 0 R 178 0 R 179 0 R 180 0 R 181 0 R 182 0 R 183 0 R 184 0 R 185 0 R 186 0 R >> /K 27 << endobj /K 0 Cf. /P 12 0 R /TextBox /Art /S /P /K 0 /Lang (EN-US) /Type /Page /Annots [] << 213 0 obj << /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Lang (EN-US) /K 3 endobj /Lang (EN-US) According to the Colorado Supreme Court, however, a court may not disqualify counsel on the basis of speculation or conjecture.. /Pg 28 0 R endobj >> /Pg 17 0 R /P 531 0 R 12. /Rotate 0 79 0 obj /P 310 0 R /K 0 endobj /S /P endobj /P 12 0 R 69 0 obj /Pg 32 0 R hearing. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Lang (EN-US) << /K 35 127 0 obj /Filter /FlateDecode /Lang (EN-US) Frequently, a former client accuses the attorney of having insider information regarding the client that does not rise to the level of a client confidence. /P 12 0 R /P 531 0 R /Lang (EN-US) You have to fill out at least 2 forms, maybe more, to file your opposition. hb```e``Z B@1V ,$pyLqLY TZ Rktz xp;9FjeNA
@+U}`D
a IsA b1 5g1160g\ $]/4OWuu/Nbbpy*+# @q@l ==*FK =
/Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /K 2 /Tabs /S /Lang (EN-US) /K 0 133 0 obj /Pg 20 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] >> /S /P << /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Pg 17 0 R /S /Reference >> << /P 509 0 R /Pg 15 0 R endobj << /S /P United States v. Ashman, 979 F.2d at 494; United States v. Roberson, 897 F.2d 1092, 1098 (11th Cir. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. /K 6 << Id. /K 2 endobj /P 508 0 R /P 12 0 R << Attorney Advertising. 183 0 obj /Pg 45 0 R /Pg 45 0 R >> << /K [18 283 0 R 20] This motion to disqualify is based on a single and brief telephone call in October 2007 for which there is neither a record nor an estimate of duration by Chinois counsel. 304 0 obj /Resources 418 0 R 137 0 obj 139 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and. /Type /Page 0000002415 00000 n
/Pg 29 0 R endobj 137 0 R 138 0 R 139 0 R 140 0 R 141 0 R 142 0 R 143 0 R 144 0 R 145 0 R 146 0 R << /P 134 0 R /Resources 452 0 R /K 3 endobj /Lang (EN-US) /P 292 0 R << /P 505 0 R Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. >> >> /Pg 27 0 R endobj 271 0 obj >> /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R /StructParents 34 /CropBox [0 0 612 792] The defendant's demand is presently under consideration by the Justice Department. 330 0 R 162 0 R] 186 0 obj endobj endobj << /Resources 448 0 R /P 298 0 R 172 0 obj /K 11 >> << endobj << >> 317 0 obj /Parent 8 0 R 1. /Lang (EN-US) Second, take effective steps to mitigate, if not eliminate, risks that a former clients confidences and secrets might be accessible to attorneys working on a matter involving the former client. /Pg 15 0 R 277 0 obj /K 1 /K 18 /P 12 0 R >> >> /Underline /Span /Annots [] This written response must be filed within two days after the motion to disqualify was . /Contents [445 0 R 446 0 R 447 0 R] /StructParents 19 3.7." Venters, 293 Kan. at 103. /Resources 387 0 R /S /TOCI 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R 64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 1992). /K [327 0 R 328 0 R] endobj 14-CV-01885-RM-BNB, 2014 WL 7177378 at *2 (D.Colo. /K 19 /Annots [] >> /K 1 127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R 132 0 R 133 0 R 134 0 R 135 0 R 136 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) But lawyers should use that weapon rarely and should resist the temptation, or a client's importuning, to . endobj /K 19 /Lang (EN-US) /StructParents 14 endobj /K [10 527 0 R] >> << In the motion, Petitioner alleged he was . >> /K 11 /P 12 0 R /S /P Tenorio moves to supplement his Response to the Department's Motion for Summary Judgment with two cases: Jordan v. As with the substantial relationship test, whether an attorneys playbook knowledge is sufficient for disqualification is heavily dependent on the facts. /K [5 512 0 R] 146 0 obj 36 0 obj Defendant Brian Frost submits this response in opposition to the Motion to Disqualify filed. endobj /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /S /P >> << /Annots [] /P 55 0 R 58 0 obj << /StructParents 9 /S /H3 3 Rules 4-1.6, 4-1.7, and 4-1.9 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar generally govern in attorney conflict of interest disqualification matters. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /S /P Subscribe to Justia's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state court opinions. >> >> /Tabs /S /Pg 16 0 R stream
>> /P 12 0 R <> /Lang (EN-US) >> /S /P /Tabs /S h[o\{ C@9\`d-X"
?[]&5>fR*UVSO?>|/qnou':._^:WZ.Z.Fw7w/>{_?xw?>G}N/_>}}z>xVp~/zOy_}xwMQm|_}{}?^~'v>'_]/Fkum-i^iz]:JZ_^_^_^_^_^_Y_Y_Y_Yu|]u|}u_5wuRWmVmVmV:C:C:P:~
/]2Vcu9Vcu9Vcu9.X][oW2WWsu5WWs\>rt=9u8Zk[s~VWZNNNNNNiuuu~m^|])^)^)^yuNNNNZuu&?:wmO]$uMuM7~vz?u=uHs[P;?D[R;of}f[oCchO\o^=7o?]N+B/r^No~{>#n?'_~xp@x."Zyc4k4&omcVmnX:5oM[iKfz&lrQ,eM,~e? endobj 202 0 obj >> Rodriguez v. Dist. << /P 12 0 R >> >> >> /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 44 0 R endobj /P 12 0 R Motions (a) Motion and opposition (1) Except as these rules provide otherwise, a party wanting to make a motion in a reviewing court must serve and file a written motion stating the grounds and the relief requested and identifying any documents on which the motion is based. /P 124 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /Resources 403 0 R /P 531 0 R /K 12 /P 528 0 R /S /P /K 13 140 0 obj >> 201 0 obj >> See People ex rel. 291 0 obj << 292 0 obj /K 0 /S /P /Contents [419 0 R 420 0 R 421 0 R] << >> /P 12 0 R 30 [174 0 R 175 0 R 176 0 R] /S /Reference << endobj /K 42 /Lang (EN-US) 46 0 obj /P 529 0 R << /S /P endobj /Pg 44 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 327 0 obj /S /P /K 4 /Lang (EN-US) endobj A motion to disqualify shall be . /S /TOCI /Pg 27 0 R 93 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /CropBox [0 0 612 792] << 202 0 R] /Annots [] /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /StructParents 12 26 0 obj +126:*l1%HQa7m'PfQn /Pg 44 0 R << /S /P >> /Kids [35 0 R 36 0 R 37 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R] Attorneys understandably may feel apprehensive about the threat of a motion to disqualify, given the potential risk and loss of work. >> 4 0 obj /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /P 133 0 R /P 12 0 R 37 0 obj /Annots [] /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /StructParents 28 /Contents [475 0 R 476 0 R 477 0 R] endobj endobj /S /P 135 0 obj /P 12 0 R /Pg 17 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) /K 8 /Lang (EN-US) 3 0 obj In Sacramento, the . /P 300 0 R 16.21 et seq. >> << endobj /Parent 10 0 R endobj /S /P 2014-1675 (Fed.Cir. 351 0 obj 27 0 obj An official website of the United States government. /Lang (EN-US) >> /StructParents 21 68 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) endobj /P 12 0 R /S /P 316 0 obj 2. As another court has observed "[t]he law does not liberally permit a defendant to call a prosecutor as a witness. Rule 8.54. << /S /P /S /P See Livingston v. /Lang (EN-US) /StructParents 5 Brown v. Encompass Ins. 1. endobj 24 0 obj << 106 0 obj Drew Mazzeo and his firm should be disqualified from further representation of Landes in this matter, due to ethical obligations toward Cuzdey as a former client, incurred when Mr. Mazzeo purchased the practice of /Pg 37 0 R /K 55 endobj << /K 12 >> 0000008092 00000 n
/K 26 /K 2 motion to disqualify. << << /Lang (EN-US) /Parent 6 0 R endobj 332 0 obj 0000013798 00000 n
<< endobj /S /P /Contents [467 0 R 468 0 R 469 0 R] 0000009358 00000 n
35 [192 0 R 193 0 R 194 0 R 195 0 R 196 0 R 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R endobj << endobj endobj /P 505 0 R >> T/CT stated that the motion was "'almost by definition untimely under these circumstances.'" C.H. /S /P << 1 18 U.S.C. endobj /S /P /P 12 0 R endobj endobj 42 0 obj endobj /Lang (EN-US) /StructParents 17 /Pg 29 0 R 107 0 R 108 0 R 109 0 R 110 0 R 111 0 R 112 0 R 113 0 R 114 0 R 115 0 R 116 0 R endobj /S /P /K 39 /P 508 0 R 0000008829 00000 n
This Comment will focus on those cases in which an attorney moves to disqualify opposing counsel because the . /K 5 282 0 R null 284 0 R 285 0 R 284 0 R null 286 0 R 287 0 R 286 0 R null /K 21 << >> /S /H3 /P 12 0 R /K 1 /Pg 23 0 R /K 1 >> 98 0 obj /P 12 0 R /K 12 Dec. 10, 2014) (order disqualifying Jones Day), assets.law360news.com/ 0606000/606910/Celgard-LGC%20Order%20disqualifying%20 Jones%20Day.pdf. /Pg 16 0 R 204 0 obj You cannot start a case by filing a motion. >> 32 0 obj << >> << /Pg 45 0 R 177 0 obj /K 19 324 0 R null 325 0 R 132 0 R 326 0 R 134 0 R] /P 12 0 R 116 0 obj >> << /P 12 0 R 29 [171 0 R 172 0 R 173 0 R] /Contents [483 0 R 484 0 R 485 0 R] disqualify the plaintiff's attorney in a suit in which the attor-ney's former 6client was not a party. endobj /P 12 0 R endobj 340 0 obj /K 24 /P 506 0 R /P 506 0 R << U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ANTITRUST DIVISION 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Rm. /Pg 20 0 R /Pg 22 0 R /Annots [] /Lang (EN-US) /K 1 /Lang (EN-US) >> /Lang (EN-US) /Footnote /Note /S /TOCI /S /P 97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R 100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R] >> /Pg 46 0 R /K 1 208 0 obj /Type /Page 23 [152 0 R 153 0 R 154 0 R 155 0 R] /K 9 /Pg 19 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 44 0 R Conflict violations are not always the focal point for resolution of a motion to disqualify. A motion is usually made in writing. /Pg 29 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Lang (EN-US) >> >> /P 12 0 R 57 0 obj /K 16 /P 12 0 R endobj << Rule 1.432 requires that a motion to disqualify be made within a reasonable time after discovering the facts upon which the motion is based. 0000001952 00000 n
<< endobj /Tabs /S /P 123 0 R 359 0 obj 355 0 R 356 0 R 357 0 R 358 0 R 359 0 R 360 0 R 361 0 R 362 0 R 363 0 R 190 0 R /P 509 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] << 180 0 obj 219 0 R 220 0 R 221 0 R 222 0 R 223 0 R 224 0 R 225 0 R 226 0 R 227 0 R 228 0 R endobj /Pg 22 0 R endobj endobj << /K 11 179 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] endobj Lansing, MI 48909 (517) 335 -7603 . /S /Reference (a) A court that determines that a person has signed a pleading or motion in violation of Section 10.001may impose a sanction on the person, a party represented by the person, or both. 47 0 obj /S /P endobj >> >> 264 0 obj << endobj endobj Myers v. Porter (In re Estate of Myers), 130 P.3d 1023, 1025 (Colo. 2006). ), aff'd, 979 F.2d 912 (2d Cir. endobj /K 0 << /S /P /K 15 /Parent 10 0 R >> /K 2 endobj HWYoF~G-I\#3 -*;Y^4N&GS/^N'jp09AYr3AG8Qw&ci`UyaFGjQ`H >pt$jxGON@QN]K+t(+|Z6*/@I f%4@Pygv,)23
j8[-h5y$#,Y+9Z2!CK >O6H)jF}ZA|k>&dn[1*.~.>u50,@Wt?fOG# i?k@;)d1GfzN]^;{f"U}2`%dC!5}| _Phf"HjjIzj[NC 63 0 obj /Contents [487 0 R 488 0 R 489 0 R] << << /Pg 33 0 R 110 0 obj /S /P /S /P 162 0 obj /Tabs /S /Pg 20 0 R >> endobj /Parent 6 0 R /K [12 521 0 R] /S /P endobj << /P 12 0 R /Pg 45 0 R /S /P >> /S /P As the motion describes, the purpose of the Compensation Pilot is to address a financial /S /Link /Resources 436 0 R /Annots [] /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R >> 105 0 obj << /Annots [] /Type /Page /P 81 0 R /K 0 252 0 obj /S /P { 10} On July 11, 2006, the trial court ordered Bikkani to provide the discovery responses, including signed authorizations to release medical records, and notified << /K 14 00021 Motion to Strike Defendant BRIAN FROST's Affirmative Defenses. /P 12 0 R endobj endobj /P 12 0 R >> /Pg 44 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) 38 0 obj /Tabs /S endobj >> /Pg 33 0 R /Tabs /S endobj << /P 56 0 R endobj /Pg 39 0 R >> >> 64 0 obj /S /P /Lang (EN-US) 229 0 R 230 0 R 231 0 R 232 0 R null] /Pg 45 0 R >> >> << /Lang (EN-US) endobj endobj >> /Lang (EN-US) endobj /P 12 0 R /Type /Pages /Pg 18 0 R << /Tabs /S /K 13 /Resources 379 0 R >> >> Increasingly, courts nationwide have recognized and accepted timely, effective ethics screens as a positive factor for permitting an attorney to continue the representation, although sometimes a screen is not enough to avoid the ramifications of an imputed conflict.12 Nonetheless, if the attorneys choose to employ a screen, it is important that it be erected before the involvement of the conflicted attorney in the new representation.13. /S /P 170 0 obj << /K 0 /P 12 0 R 347 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /K 2 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R] >> /P 12 0 R >> 175 0 obj /P 509 0 R /Pg 16 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) /Rotate 0 << /Pg 34 0 R /Pg 18 0 R /Rotate 0 /P 528 0 R /Pg 30 0 R /Pg 37 0 R /S /P /P 55 0 R << /K 8 An oral motion on the record, by an attorney of record, IS a formal motion, even if not accepted and demanded by the court to be submitted in writing. /P 530 0 R /P 528 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Type /Page /P 294 0 R endobj 19 0 obj /K 30 << /S /P << /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /K 23 /Pg 16 0 R Health, Education & Family Services Division . /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) >> << >> /S /P 279 0 obj << General Use: Description. >> >> /K 3 /Pg 16 0 R >> /Rotate 0 /StructParents 35